"You've got mail, S#@thead!"

From yesterday's N.Y. Times media section:

"In a twist straight out of the movies, some publishers speculated that many of the independents that survived the big chains over the last 15 years might be in an unusually stable position. By the American Booksellers Association’s count, there are more than 2,000 independent bookstores in the United States.

“Being small and privately held allows us to be more nimble,” said Chris Morrow, owner of the Northshire Bookstore in Manchester Center, Vt. “Our competitive advantage has been the curation aspect — knowing our customers and picking the right books.

“We still have that competitive advantage,” he added. “Barnes & Noble doesn’t have that.”


You've got mail, S#@thead.

Actually, this has been my take on things for some time now. Did you notice how little effect Walmart had on downtown Bend? You know why? Because we'd already weeded out anyone who could be killed off when the Mountain View Mall and the Bend River Mall opened in 1979.

30 years later, the malls are both gone, torn down, and replaced by another dinosaur concept that the big chains think will work better. But downtown Bend has clawed its way back, and those who survived, those who colonized the neutron bomb blasted territory, hardly felt a twinge from Walmart.

The other way I always put it: The dinosaurs forced the mammals to scurry between their feet in the cracks in the rocks for survival strategy, and when the Big Change came, the same survival strategy helped them survive. The dinosaurs who ruled the earth? They're all gone.

The thing about high volume and low price? You have to keep it up. You have to keep beating off competitors who may come in at even lower price; you have to keep that volume up by opening new stores. Once you try to back away from either concept, you lose your reason for being.

You'll notice they always try. "We're refocusing on service and selection. We're going to bring in toys and other product. Blah, blah, blah."

Sorry, Tom Hanks. People shop at your store because you have bezillions of books. Not because they think the clerk is going to know what the hell book you're asking about. Not because of toys. Or games.

Books and a comfortable place to spill coffee on them.


Downtown Openings and Closings.

Downtown Bend Fills Up.

That sounds like one of those optimistic Bulletin headlines, doesn't it? But it seems to be true.

When I first started this list, I thought I might be chronicling the decline of downtown. Maybe a Fall and then a Rise. I never thought it would get as bad as the early '80's, which was a depression in downtown in all but name, but I thought we'd see more go out than came in.

Almost from the beginning, that hasn't been true. There have consistently been more openings than closings.

As I've said before, it doesn't necessarily reflect strength in the economy, but it certainly reflects strength in the image of downtown and it's overall desirability. At first, I think a few people questioned the purpose of such a list -- which originally was meant by me to be a consistent record that I could look back on and hopefully see a pattern.

But here it is, objective evidence of downtown Bend's vibrancy.

Without further ado.

When I came back from the weekend, there was a store nearly completed across the street where Showcase Hats was. The Closet, which is apparently a 'new' clothing store.

Speaking of Showcase Hats, there is a big changeover on Oregon Ave. , the next block over, where the hat place is apparently going to move into the space where the Pottery Lounge is now, and....the Pottery Lounge is moving into the Magill Drug space. This is a large space that has been open for at least a couple of years now. With the addition of the Red Chair Gallery, Oregon Ave. , between Wall and Bond has pretty much filled up.

In fact, downtown Bend has pretty much filled up. Oh, there are still some spaces, most notably along the base of the parking garage, but there have always been open spaces even during the boom, in fact, I'd guess that we had more vacancies during most of the boom. (It would be a guess...thus the need for the list, eh?)

I did add Urban Minx to the Leavings list, because they have sign in the window for lease and that they are 'expanding' into a new space. If that space turns out to be in downtown, I'll add it to the list at that time.

NEW BUSINESSES DOWNTOWN

The Closet, Minnesota Ave., 8/11/10.
Showcase Hats, Oregon Ave., 8/11/10,
Red Chair Art Gallery, Oregon Ave. 7/13/10.
Earth Sense Herbs, Penny's Galleria, 7/12/10.
Mad Happy Lounge, Brooks St., 6/2910
Common Table, Oregon Ave. , 6/29/10.
Looney Bean Coffee, Brooks St. , 6/29/10.
Bourbon Street, Minnesota Ave., 6/22/10
Feather's Edge, Minnesota Ave., 6/22/10
The BLVD., Wall St. , 6/13/10.
Volt, Minnesota Ave. 6/1/10.
Tart, Minnesota Ave. , 5/13/10
Olivia Hunter, Wall St. 4/5/10.
Tres Chic, Bond St. 4/5/10
Blue Star Salon, Wall St. 4/1/10.
Lululemon, Bond St. 3/31/10.
Diana's Jewel Box, Minnesota Ave., 3/25/10.
Amalia's, Wall St. (Ciao Mambo space), 3/12/10
River Bend Fine Art, Bond St. (Kebanu space) 2/23/10
Federal Express, Oregon Ave. 2/1/10
***10 Below, Minnesota Ave. 1/10/10
Tew Boots Gallery, Bond St. 1/8/10.
Top Leaf Mate, 12/10/09
Laughing Girls Studio, Minnesota Ave. 12/7/09
Lemon Drop, 5 Minnesota Ave., 11/12/09
The Curiosity Shoppe 11/5/09 25 N.W. Minnesota Ave, Suite #7.
Wabi Sabi 11/4/09
Frugal Boutique 11/4/09
5 Spice 10/22/09
Cowgirls Cash 10/17/09
***Haven Home 10/17/09
Dog Patch 10/17/09
The Good Drop 10/12/09
Lola's 9/23/09
**Volcano Wines 9/15/09
Singing Sparrow Flowers 8/16/09
Northwest Home Interiors 8/5/09
High Desert Frameworks 7/23/09 (*Moved to Oregon Ave. 4/5/10.)
Wall Street Gifts 7/--/09
Ina Louise 7/14/09
Bend Home Hardware (Homestyle Hardware?) 7/1/09
Altera Real Estate 6/9/09
Honey 6/7/09
Azura Studio 6/7/09
Mary Jane's 6/1/09
c.c.McKenzie 6/1/09
Velvet 5/28/09
Bella Moda 3/25/09
High Desert Gallery (Bend) 3/25/09
Joolz
Zydeco
900 Wall
Great Outdoor Store
Luxe Home Interiors
Powell's Candy
Dudley's Used Books and Coffee
Goldsmith
Game Domain
Subway Sandwiches
Bend Burger Company
Showcase Hats
Pita Pit
Happy Nails

BUSINESSES LEAVING

Urban Minx, Minnesota Ave., 8/11/10
Old Bend Distillery, Brooks St., 6/19/10.
Staccato, Minnesota Ave. 6/18/10.
Showcase Hats, Minnesota Ave., 6/1/10
Cork, Oregon Ave., 5/27/10.
Wall Street Gifts, 5/26/10
Microsphere, Wall St. , 5/17/10.
Singing Sparrow, Franklin and Bond, 5/15/10
28, Minnesota Ave. and Bond, 5/13/10.
Glass Symphony, Wall St., 3/25/10
Bend Home Hardware, Minnesota Ave, 2/25/10
Ciao Mambo, Wall St. 2/4/10
***Angel Kisses 1/25/10 (Have moved to 'Honey.')
Ivy Rose Manor 8/20/09
***Downtowner 8/18/09 (moving into the Summit location)
Chocolate e Gateaux 8/16/09
Finders Keepers 8/15/09
Colourstone 7/25/09
Periwinkle 6/--/09
***Tangerine 7/21/09 (Got word, they are moving across the street.)
Micheal Cassidy Gallery 6/15/09
St. Claire Coffee 6/15/09
Luxe Home Interiors 6/4/09
Treefort 5/8/09
Blue 5/2/09
***Volcano Tasting Room 4/28/09** Moved to Minnesota Ave.
Habit 4/16/09
Mountain Comfort 4/14/09
Tetherow Property 4/11/09
Blue Moon Marketplace 3/25/09
Plenty 3/25/09
Downtown Doggie 3/25/09
***King of Sole (became Mary Janes)**
Santee Alley
Bistro Corlise
Made in Hawaii
EnVogue
Stewart Weinmann (leather)
Kebanu Gallery
Pella Doors and Windows
Olive company
Pink Frog
Little Italy
Deep
Merenda's
Volo
***Pomegranate (downtown branch)**
Norwalk
Pronghorn Real Estate office.
Speedshop Deli
Paper Place
Bluefish Bistro

Lessons still to learn.

Earlier, I talked about how a 10 or 15% drop in sales was fairly easy to accommodate. It really isn't how much I bring in that counts, but how much I spend. (Well, it's both, but one I have control over and one I don't...)

I left out the most important way of doing this; simply paying attention to the budget. As anyone who has done a personal budget knows, little things add up, both in expenses and in purchases.

Going into my fourth decade of doing this, (which sounds impossible), I still have lessons to learn. Well, maybe not learn, so much as actually pay heed to. I know, in the back of my mind, that these problems exist but can usually ignore them.

For instance, it isn't a secret that there is an extra week of shipments every three months or so.
But since I order on a monthly basis, I always tell myself that I should be able to average-out the weeks; take the monthly order and divide it by 5 instead of 4.

But experience has taught me that this isn't what happens. The average-out is over a much longer period of time, and late and lagging material seems to congregate on the fifth weeks, for some reason.

In other words, any month with a fifth week will take a bigger bite out of the budget.

Usually I can ignore this, or adapt, but this year the fifth weeks pretty much fell on the fifth week of July, and first week of August, so both months budgets were inflated. (I could have hurried one of the fifth weeks into the first quarter, or delayed a fifth week into the fourth quarter, but I've learned to dump all extra expenses into summer.)

I just didn't plan for this increase, and it made it much harder to turn the profit I'd hoped for. My bad. I suppose I ought to check the calendar on a regular basis, so I can plan better.



The second lesson I know but don't listen to, is that I tend not to earmark enough for small expenses and or purchases. But these little reorders, these unexpected overhead costs, can add up.

Someone comes in and wants a couple of 20.00 graphic novels, and my cost is roughly 20.00, and it seems petty to write it down. Or I run out of lightbulbs, and I grab a box on the way to work.

Sure I have a budget for unexpected expenses, but I need to probably have a budget for expected unexpected expenses and also a budget for unexpected unexpected expenses.

It's amazing how just holding off for a week changes the whole dynamic. Sometimes I find a substitute, or a deal, or find hidden resources or just flat out decide I don't need something after all.

When things are humming along, I tend to relax about the little stuff. This isn't wrong, I don't think. Life is too short to be caught up every instant in counting pennies. But when the sales tighten up, I snap to it again.

I've gotten better about maintaining my discipline over the years. I still brown bag my lunch, for instance, even when business is good. I still stay away from constant sodas and chips and beer and wine and candy and donuts, by not slipping that twenty dollar bill in my pocket on the way home. This has saved literally tens of thousands of dollars over the last 15 years.

Nevertheless, I need to start examining the small expenses again, because it really does add up.

Book trade paradigm.

My wife's mother was born in 1905, and she still remembered the horse and buggy days, seeing early cars and her first airplane.

I think we're living in one of those times, like the introduction of the railroad and the telegraph.

Change is always happening, but the kind of change the internet represents is truly a once in a lifetime paradigm shift. We all thought it was the computer that was changing things, but I think the internet is having even more impact. (Yes, I know -- the internet is only possible because of the computer.)

There is a certain thrill the creative destruction that's occurring right now. I'd like to stick around long enough to see where it's going.

It's fun to think about the potential of the book trade, for instance, even though I'm going to be affected by it.

One thing that has puzzled me, and I haven't read anyone else really comment on it, is I wonder how the makers of Nook and Kindle think they are going to keep the e-book in any way proprietary.

If it's the technology they're selling, then I'd put my money on a couple of alternatives. On the high end, I'd be willing to bet that Apple is going to eat their lunch. That they'll be quicker and more thorough and more ruthless in advancing the state of the art.

On the low end, I'm just betting that there will be many, many low cost alternatives that will do what Kindle and Nook do, probably just about as well.

So is the money in the selling of books?

Only if it's somehow exclusive to that particular reader.

What happens if you can only get a particular book on a particular reader? I think the whole thing falls apart. The whole thing becomes Balkanized. Hell, it might come down to each individual publisher selling their books on their their own individual e-reader.

I'm betting that won't happen. Certainly, it would lower the value of the e-reader to the point I'd doubt I'd want one. If that happens, paper books will start looking more attractive again.

So if any reader can download any book, than I'd bet on entities other than Amazon and Barnes and Noble being cheaper. There are always people willing to sell for cost, in the attempt to gain market share.

The money from online newspapers isn't replacing the money they get from the physical paper. Every time a paper goes behind a paywall, it drops in readership. I know that I read the Oregonian and the USA Today online every day, after having bought the physical newspaper for decades.

If I was Barnes and Noble, I'd probably try to take the enterprise private, and then rededicate into doing a good job as a brick and mortar business. If it requires smaller stores, then that's what I'd do. More selective inventory? Then I'd do that. But I wouldn't bet on my future being technology -- or online service. I think others will be much better at it.

We'll see, I guess.

Books are my future...hmmmm.

Book T.V. seems to have a panel about the future of books just about every weekend, and you can tell they're all worried. No one knows where it's going, everyone fears the worst. One of the panelists yesterday was asked pointblank, and he spun off an answer that he more or less implied that he was under instructions to give: The future of paper is secure. We're not worried.

What was funny was, he said it in such a rote way that you could tell he didn't believe it.

Meanwhile, on the other C-Span channel, they had another book expert talking about this Fall's books, and their projected print-runs, and she questioned the fears of imminent doom and talked about how many books were be published by big name authors.

Over on Rocketbomber, he talks about a 25 billion dollar book industry where only a small percentage is going to digital, so far.

The book, The Diamond Age, by Neal Stephenson, keeps coming to mind. (Written in 1995.) A little girl is given a book by her parents, and every time she reads it, the content has changed to suit her age and circumstances.

In other words, an electronic book may only be the beginning of the innovations.

And here I am sailing full sail into the winds of publishing, damn the torpedoes.

I think I'm uniquely positioned to weather the coming conflict, at least in the short run.

Meanwhile, I'm mulling over buying more bookshelves and more books. So far, I'm been a bit haphazard in the way I've purchased my stock. It's been easy to pick the low hanging fruit; the best classics and cult books and favorites.

I think I can continue to pick the best of the best-- but I need to find a more systematic way to discover what those are. And whatever system I use, needs to be easy and sustainable.

I'm thinking I need maybe 4 or 5 sites that have worthwhile lists -- which I figure are out there.
It's just finding them in the sheer quantity of sites devoted to books. The 'expert' I talked about above has a site called Shelf Awareness, and when I went to it, I couldn't believe I'd never heard of it before.

So I need to start doing some serious research on which books to buy going into the next few years. More of what I'm doing, but also with a bit more effort to fill in around the edges.

Ode to Solitaire.

Sometimes at the end of a long day, I'll play a game of solitaire. Or two. Or one hundred.

It's very soothing, and somewhat addicting.

I think it's because it's such a neutral thing. It doesn't play favorites. It doesn't care if you had a good day or a bad day. It doesn't care if you are skinny or fat, rich or poor, young or old.

It's just a mathematical construct, who (which) doesn't even know you're playing it.

It's a pure meritocracy, if you will.

Which, like I say, is very refreshing.

Matching your wits against something that won't play favorites, who won't judge you, which only responds to true input, not status or looks or money.

So I play the game, and I can see patterns, and I can see luck, and I can see skill. I can test my awareness and smarts, and I can look for ways to beat it, and it plays fair, dammit. Totally fair.

It's like Zen. Even when I'm losing, it seems right and proper with the world. All is fair and equal, and it's just the way things are.

When luck and skill combine, the cards just seem to click into place, and it seems easy.

And when luck and skill fail, nothing clicks, and I lose game after game after game. But it's O.K., Cause I'm sure I'll win the NEXT game.

I had a friend once, who actually ended up moving to Vegas to pursue her interest in poker. (She played online). I asked her if she ever thought of playing Vegas-style Solitaire, and she laughed in my face. "Too much luck," she said.

Well, yeah. Luck and skill. But her idea of a good game was one which she could outplay other people -- take advantage of their weaknesses, and their lack of skill, and play mind games, and just more or less prey on other players. The stronger against the weaker.

No thanks.

I'd rather play the hard cold world of luck and skill and see how I come out. Me against the System, me against the Universe, which will reward me without caring if I play consistently and well. But who will punish me with an equal lack of caring when I fail.

Fair enough, I say.

Back when I was writing, what appealed to me was that I thought of it as a meritocracy. I thought if I wrote something really good, it would be published. I'd be paid. The readers would read it and like it or not like it, but ...it wouldn't be filtered it wouldn't be constantly hindered by office politics and favoritism.

Naive, huh? But after failing miserably to get any kind of worthwhile job after college because I interviewed horribly and maybe that was only the truth because I wasn't a people person but I would have been a smart, honest, reliable and hard worker --well, I thought the writing would speak for itself.

Same thing with the store. I don't have to play games with co-workers, or schmooze with the boss, or try to convince my supervisor I'm doing a good job.

When you own a business, bottom-line is -- either you earn money or you don't, and it ain't open to interpretation, to favoritism, or stupid bosses, or brown-nosing supervisors.

In a way, that's almost the very definition of a nerd; feeling more comfortable with systems than people. Looking back, I think I was lucky to have made my career as a storekeeper instead of a writer. Owning a store made me deal with people on a daily basis and smoothed away the rougher edges of my personality, which probably wouldn't have happened as a writer. With me, isolation breeds isolation.

So I wouldn't trade it. Still, it's nice to come home sometimes to a non-human interaction, which engages the brain and the luck, but not the emotions....

Solitaire is like that with me. It's just a way to test my skill and my luck, without being hampered by others.

I guess that's why they call it Solitaire.

Comics are the rock.

A big irony for me is that, despite the overall impression I've had about comics, despite my doubts and fears, the fact is -- other than the boom and bust from 1994 - 1999, -- comics have been a pretty steady seller.

Comics usually only get me to about 65% of the sales I need to be viable. But, pretty steady at that. Even as the population has increased. Even as prices substituted for smaller volume. Even as movies discovered comics, and graphic novels became about 40% of my comic sales totals. Comics have remained 50 to 65% of the money I need to stay open.

Someone said once, that comics have been dying since they were created. Tens of millions sold per month in the 40's and 50's, millions in the 60's and 70's, and even the average seller did 100,000's in the 80's and most of the '90's. Now, just the absolute best-selling titles reach 100,000 an issue.

In my career, I've seen comics go from .60 to 3.50 average price. From newsprint paper to slick paper. The creativity has never wavered. Indeed, it's probably the best it's ever been. As sales drop, the brilliance seems to increase, and only Hollywood seems to understand the pure insane creativity of the artform.

I've known that comics were a strong platform from which to run my business -- even when sports cards went crazy and became 85% of my sales, I never gave up on comics. In fact, I was careful to use some of that sport card money to actually grow my sales in comics.

But I've never thought of comics as being "steady." As being "reliable."

Pretty much the opposite.

Individual comics boom and bust on a regular basis -- in fact, nothing stays popular forever. Artists and writers come and go. Characters become popular, then over-exposed, and fade. Comic companies come and go. Styles come and go.

But comics in aggregate, are actually pretty predictable.

Believe me, this has NOT been the way I've thought about comics over most of the last 27 years. Most of that time I cursed the fact that comic sales couldn't quite get over the hump. Couldn't quite seem to earn me a good living. The market always seemed fragile and iffy and just too damn small. I constantly cast about for product to pick up the slack.

I still try to diversify. But it has occurred to me lately, that comics are that good, solid 50% of my business -- while just about everything else I bring in slides up and down.

I think it's time to celebrate that comics are a good, steady half of my business, instead of bemoaning that they can't be all my business.

And as further irony, I think its the smaller size of the audience for comics which has made it so steady.

It takes effort and time and space and knowledge to do comics. You can't just throw money at it, like a chain store might be able to do. At least, the effort and time and space and knowledge are too much for the average return.

That fact of being able to get to only 65% of viable, while being in an average sized market for a comic store, is a dead giveaway that comics are a challenge for anyone who wants real monetary returns. A challenge which a small guy like me is willing to pick up and pursue, because of the ability to run a business that is so specialized that only someone else like me is likely to try.

I think it took the Great Recession for me to realize that comics just keep humming along, even as the marketplace constantly changes -- digitalization, rising prices, constant shifting of focus by the publishers, Hollywood dalliances, -- despite all that, comics have actually increased a bit over the last year.

So comics.

I apologize for doubting you.

You're my huckleberry.

Whooops, sorry.....

Judy, the sister of my pal Wes, came in to the store yesterday. We were talking books, and suddenly she produces a NOOK, and says, "Oh, I'm sorry. I probably shouldn't have shown you that."

I shrug it off, then later in the conversation, she produces a Sony Reader, and laughs, "Oh, I'm sorry. I probably shouldn't have shown you that."

I figure this is going to be a new sport. Let's torture the bookstore owner by showing him our digital reader. Ha, Ha.

I used to mock banish people for mentioning the W word; (shhhh....walmart). Or the B & N word: (quietly, now....barnes and noble.)

Or I'll break into my customers and employee conversations with a menacing tone: "You aren't talking about Video Games are you? You know better than to do that in MY store...."

Seriously, what can I do about it?

There's a great post over on Rocketbomber blog, where he talks about how bookstores aren't about efficiency any more than sex is about procreation, most of the time. He says it better than that, and it's worth a read.

All I can do is play out the game, you know. Try to figure the angles. Keep selling to those who enjoy bookstores and want to keep them around.

The effect of a drop.

A 10 or 15% drop in sales sounds dreadful, I know. But its actually a fairly easy number to accommodate. Big chains have a bad month if their sales are down 2 or 3%, whereas for my small store 2 or 3% is an almost insignificant number. I think a single small store is going to have more extreme swings, both up and down, because the %'s aren't averaged out over a large number of stores.

The caveat, I suppose, is that you have to react in time for the drop to be canceled out. Or, if you are buying for a 10% increase instead, it can be a double whammy. That's why dramatic increases in sales can be dangerous to the store if not handled properly.

I believe a good, healthy store should be using somewhere around 10% of their budget for increasing inventory; by trying experimental, or the whimsical, or the good product that might have been overlooked.

You've got to constantly try new things, at the same time you're maintaining your core inventory. At least that's what I do.

I also save up around 10% of my budget to buy "SALE" product, stuff that's been discounted. It's another way for me to try material that I ordinarily wouldn't carry. Stuff that I passed on the first time around.

I suppose it points out that I'm more interested in having a good store than a bottomline store. Then again, it wouldn't be hard to make the case that this extra effort is what has made the store survive all these years.

Most customers aren't going to notice that you didn't order something you didn't have before, but they are eventually going to notice if your core product is run down. However, keeping the core product in stock isn't that difficult for me, as long as I'm not out there spending money on other things.

I tend to alternate. One month of not buying "SALE" material; the next month not buying the experimental and quirky; the next month foregoing the "SALE" material, and so on.

When there is a slowdown, I tend to ask myself: "If I don't order this product, will anyone notice?" Obviously, that's a different question than asking, "Will it sell?" Or "Will people think this is cool?"

Anyway, I don't think maintaining the inventory rather than expanding, hurts the store in the short run; months, perhaps even a year or two. Especially a store like mine which has so much odd and offbeat material already.

But I wouldn't want to go forever without the quirky, the experimental, the offbeat. Every good comic store is going to have the same core product.

It's the unusual stuff that makes your store unique.

July results.

I've been playing it cautiously this summer. After 7 months of beating last year, we dropped slightly in May. That seemed odd to me, so I cut back on my spending plans to take a wait and see approach.

Good thing I did, because June was worse. Again, I scaled back on my plans. I was already being moderate in my spending, because I was hoping to garner some cash profits over the summer. Instead, I was making a small profit, and sales weren't improving.

I've learned one thing over the last couple decades. Don't doubt the downturn. React as quickly as possible, and hold off any other changes. Which is what I did.

So, without further ado, here are July's results.

We were down 13.2%, which isn't fun, but not nearly as bad as the 33% we were down as of the 15th of July. The first half of July was just a conflagration. The second half was actually pretty good, matching last year, but the store couldn't overcome the crappy first half.

So 13.5% looks relatively decent, what with lowered expectations.

What would have happened if that had been reversed? What if the first half of July had been as good as last year, and the second half was the awful half? I probably would've overspent. I would've thought things were on course, that the small downturn in May, and the bigger downturn in June were a blip and due to bad weather.

So the fates conspired to have me fully warned and vigilante. So we managed to come out of July with the credit cards paid off, and all the bills paid. This should have happened by June, frankly, but I'll take it. Breaking even being the new black.

It still gives me a chance to make some money in August, and...further down the road...at Christmas. But my hackles are up, and I'm delaying purchases until they are truly needed, and putting off the inventory expansion I had planned until I can do it within cash flow. (I'd planned to got ahead and use credit, but I've had second thoughts.)

The thing is -- I can always increase my buying, but once committed, it's almost impossible to decrease my buying. So a wait and see attitude is the right attitude right now. Basically, 3 down months in a row is my double dip recession, whatever the economists might say.

First the good, then the bad.

Comic sales are up, surprisingly. I have a blog I'm going to post about that tomorrow. Graphic novels were down slightly, but the two combined were still healthily above last year. It shows that my local regulars are hanging in there.

Books sales were good. Last year was spectacular, so we didn't quite reach those numbers, but still really good.

Game sales were even better. The increase more than matched the small decrease in books, so overall, my two newest categories were over last year.

The Bad.

Magic sales dropped precipitously. I'm guessing that chainstore stocking and online discounters are taking the lion's share of business, these days. This is eerily reminiscent of sports cards in their declining years, and I'm reacting accordingly. I'm keeping the product stocked, but sticking to my price and ordering small amounts.

Toys were down quite a bit. I think this reflects what was the weakness of the tourist dollar this year, since these are mostly off-the-street impulse buys.

Sports cards were down, as well. Just didn't have those several boxes of sales I usually get from tourists.

Overall, surprisingly, I feel like the local economy is holding up it's end, but the tourist economy has been worse than I expected. I think, perhaps, last year there was still the hope that things would recover quickly. Maybe it's really sinking in that vacations are not to time to go crazy buying things.

Bookstores in Eastern Oregon.

We visited four bookstores on our trip.

There were two bookstores in La Grande.

Sunflower Books, in a house one block over from the main drag. Small mystery, S.F. and romance sections. In fact, hardly any genre at all. Mostly literary fiction. So not only in a small town but limiting their possible sales to only one kind of book. Though admittedly, their selection of those types of books were good, and in some ways reminded me of what I choose to carry.

Mentioned that Linda and I had bookstores in Bend, and they just ignored us.

Didn't even ask the names of our stores. Shrug.


Earth N'Books. Nicely laid out, seemed to be mostly a used bookstore, though they say "new" on the sign. Typical paperback exchange type, neat and tidy, but nothing there that wasn't anything we hadn't seen before.


In Baker City.

We checked out Turn the Page, which was closed on Mondays. But when I poked my nose into the door, they opened for us. They had new bookshelves that they were transferring books to. Another typical paperback exchange type store, not a lot of hardcovers, but lots of genre books.

The owner had actually visited Pegasus Books; she said that before she opened six years ago, she visited dozens of bookstores, and in fact had changed to our type trading policy after trying one of the old % type strategies earlier. "It's so much more simple and easy to understand," she said.

She was nice, and happy to exchange information.


Betty's Books. Right across from Old Geezer Hotel.

This was a fun visit. The two owners were there early Monday morning, and seemed delighted to talk about books and bookselling. (The husband at first, before I wore him out and he exited. The wife got the soft approach from Linda, and by the time I was talking to her, I was being softer too. I've just got to learn to be more subtle.)

Thing about downtown Baker is that they have these amazing old buildings. Unfortunately, lots of them are empty, and most of them would need some investment, but they have "Good Bones".

The "Betty" of Betty's Books was the mother of one of the current owners, and they own the building and live above the store. They have been open more than 30 years, in the same location. (Oh, and they had a very cool ceiling.)

The book selection was excellent. Especially the Local History books section, which I was envious of. I've been unable to get a decent selection of local books in my store because it requires separate accounts with each publisher, and I don't have that information nor the volume to make it work. But I recognize that it would be a nice addition to my store if I tried to pursue it.

But mostly, they didn't seem threatened by us, were genuinely curious about how we do our stores. I mentioned that I thought they might do well with a small selection of boardgames, not go crazy, but maybe a few each of Settlers of Catan, Ticket to Ride, and Carcassonne, and she seemed actually interested in the idea.

This was the kind of visit I wish we could could have more often.

By the way, I don't think it's any accident that Betty's Books has survived for more than 30 years. I think curiosity and excellence go together.

CACB. Spin the wheel.

Can anyone figure out what's happening with CACB?

Up?

Down?

Sideways?

Or just blowing smoke.

I will say one thing for them, they aren't going to go down quietly. The other banks that have closed around here seemed to whimper in the corner until the FDIC came and got them. At least, for all I heard about them.

CACB is spinning and spinning. I Think I Can. I Think I Can.

But I have to guess, fundamentally, their situation has improved marginally, if at all. There has been no rescue by investors, and indeed that all may have fallen through. They're sueing some firm because they won't accept .20 on the dollar. (Was that in writing?)

Did they lose more money than they let on? Could be -- they appear to be revising previously released totals.

Are their commercial loans that are out there just being "Pretended and Extended?" That would be my guess.

Will they be able to renew the 'deal' where two investors will match private contributions? It sounds like that has fallen through, but what did it mean anyway? Wasn't it just a plea of, "Mom, I'll do my homework just as soon as I get done playing with Sammy."

They certainly are sending out lots of signals. Getting the Bulletin to produce a headline that says, "POSITIVE SIGNS FROM BANK OF THE CASCADES," though the text of the article seems much more subdued than that. "roughly break-even," would imply to me that they didn't actually break-even....otherwise, why not just say so? If they turned a profit, even the smallest of profits, why not say that?

But they aren't releasing the "complete" earnings report until later.

Is this an expectation game? Mention "roughly breaking even" and then announcing a small profit? Or preparing investors for loses by couching it as "roughly breaking even?" Either way, it would seem to be spin.

It may be enough that they are trying so hard, and the FDIC may just be sitting back to see if they can pull it off.

Barnes and Nobles Blinks.

In reading all the press reports of the possible sale of Barnes and Nobles, the one thing that I find hard to decipher is the motivations of the people behind the various factions.

What direction do they want to take the company? What advantages would going private have, or disadvantages? Is there a party who wants to go faster into digital, one who wants to go slower? One who wants to downsize the brick and mortar locations, or one who want to keep expanding, possibly even buying Borders? Is there disagreement of the product mix, or pricing, or online strategy?

These are probably naive questions. It's probably all about stock price and manipulation of perception. A power struggle for control of a still profitable company.

But having some idea of the motivation for going private would help me know who to root for.

I had the same problem years ago with the fight for Marvel. It was hard to know who had the best interests of the company at heart, and who just wanted to plunder the company and strip it of its assets. (Well, we knew the owner of Marvel -- one Ron Perlman, of Revlon infamy -- who drove it into bankruptcy -- was pretty much a Pirate -- even Forbes Mag. called him that. Come on, how BAD do you have to be to have even Forbes call you a Pirate?)

I've maintained for some time that Barnes and Nobles is a ponzi scheme, like many other chainstores, dependent on constantly opening new stores and driving the stock price. They could control the price and publishing decisions of the publishers by their buying clout. The digital revolution has obviously called that strategy into question, as well as the downturn in the economy, and now there is even a question of downsizing, which I suspect would mean the slow death of the company.

It's interesting how quickly this whole thing has reached a nexus point. Big change, could mean big improvement, but could also open the door to big fat disaster. I tend to make small changes, over time, incrementally, in response to change -- but then, I don't have shareholders looking over my shoulder.

Barnes and Nobles has had to be aggressive in expanding to satisfy the ponzi returns.

But that whole theory is based on the public nature of the company. A private company, who doesn't have to keep reporting quarterly earnings to it's shareholders, could approach the future with a much more methodical and measured pace. I've never been sure if B & N is profitable without the ponzi nature of it's growth -- but I suspect the bookstore model is still viable, and managed well could still dominate the future of bookselling. Hmmm....do I really want that?

See what I mean? It may be petty of me, but keeping it public would -- I think -- inevitably cause the company to falter, especially with the "Sky is Falling!" perception of digital. Whereas private ownership could Shepard the changeover in private -- realizing that e-books are currently a very small percentage of profits even if growing spectacularly. Steady and measured growth, and/or downsizing, while moving full speed into the e-book world of the future would seem to me to be the way to go. (I personally believe the whole digital thing is going to spin out of control and take permutations that no one currently perceives and that it will be harder for these big companies to make big money off it than they're planning. Think Blockbuster.)

Of course, it may still end up being a public company but with a different mix of managers. Personally, much as I may dislike the monster he has created, I'd bet on Riggio caring more about where the company he created goes, than an outsider.

Then again -- it's most likely a power struggle.

What the heck. I hope they rip each other's throat out...

Old Geiser Grand

I kept calling it the Geezer, and everyone corrected me, Guyser.

I still call it the Old Geezer, though.

Wonderful old architecture, a room at least three times bigger than the previous motel. Night and day, I tell you. And only 40.00 more -- and a price that is cheaper than the average coastal motel. High ceilings and tall windows and lots of old crown molding and a chandelier and fluffy bathrobes...

This is the type of living I'd like to try a bit more often.



Before that:

After picking Linda up from church, we drove to Kina's Paizano's Pizza. I figured I couldn't blog about Baker if I didn't drop by. I whispered that we were from Bend to the counter girl and out came Keeneye, all bright and cheery and welcoming. Her crew was very friendly and industrious and helpful. The place seemed busy even on an early Sunday afternoon.

We both had lasagna, and it was truly fantastic. I really can't think of a place in Bend that is it's equivalent. First class food in a casual setting.

After warning her about being too successful, and then contradicting myself by saying how great she'd do in Bend,("Too many restaurants!" she exclaimed) we went on our way. If you check out my Pegasus Blog, I have a link to her blog about her place,(Untrained Professional (now changed to Pizza Pro) with OCD.) It's been interesting to read her write about her experiences, from start up stage to now. I feel strangely protective of her business, and keep trying to tell her to slow down and enjoy.

In the end, we felt like Joseph was too far, so we took the backroads through Medical Springs and on up to Unity. Unity was more like what we expected Ukiah to be, so it was bigger than we expected and a pleasant surprise. Kept going, until we got to Cove. Linda got a vanilla and I got a chocolate ice cream cone. That was the big payoff to the trip.

This is Monday morning, and check out is noon, and darn if I'm in a hurry. We'll mosey out of here well before noon, but still...it's nice not to hurry.

Like I said, we're going to walk the Baker downtown, and then...maybe jaunt over to LaGrande where there are two bookstores. Then again, that would be the third time back and forth from the two burgs, which even with I84 might be a bit much. I'm up for it, but I don't know if Linda is.





We walked the streets of Baker, but most stores were closed. It really has a lot of vacancies, which aren't noticeable at first. But nice stores, as well. Great potential. But you can see how Bend is much more pedestrian friendly. We plan and visiting the stores this morning (Monday). There are at least 3 or 4 bookstores, between Baker and LaGrande, so that's interesting.

Baker or Baker City?


We went on a four day vacation again. This time, to Baker City and La Grande. (Actually, three days since we're back and recovering...)

At first, we thought we'd go to Boise, but after a couple days of mulling over what a long drive that would be, I turned to Linda and said, "Wouldn't you rather go to the coast? There is a bookstore in Newport we've been meaning to visit."

So that was the plan for another couple of days.

But Linda seemed less than enthusiastic, so finally I said, "Honey. Really. Where would YOU like to go, I'm easy."

"I'd rather go to Baker City again," she said. So we booked a room. She mentioned later in the day that there was a bit of trouble getting rooms because of the Shriners.

"Whoa. Did you say Shriners? Do you remember the time they had a Shriners convention at that motel we stayed in in Portland for a comic convention? And that they were partying until 3:00 in the morning?"

I went online and found out it was the East/West Shriners Football game, and a Shriners Parade.

"Babe. Think Fred Flintstone and Barney Rubble at their lodge. Party crazy."

"Fred Flintstone drinks?"

"Um. Well, they partied as if they drank, that's what I remember. Yahoo city."

So we booked a room in Rodeway Inn in La Grande, instead.


We checked out the Painted Hills, first. Took lots of pictures. I started to notice that Linda and I were often taking pictures in the opposite direction as all the other tourists. We tend not to take the obvious views. What are we ever going to do with all these pictures?

We came up north from John Day, through Ukiah. Linda had a childhood friend who told stories about how beautiful Ukiah was, so when we reached it, it turned out to be a bit of a disappointment. Another small, rural town struggling to survive.

Still, we were exploring new territory. There are all these roads that run between the major hightways that aren't used all that much, but are incredibly scenic. We stopped along the perfect skinny dipping spot, and thought about it, but I laughed and said, "We'll probably find out that the Scenic Overlook is just up there." Sure enough, within a couple hundred yards we came across a major campground.

It was quiet and beautiful and serene, and just high enough in the mountains to be the perfect low 80's temp. Large firs, and ponderosa pines, and rolling hillsides that I doubt have ever had humans walking on them. Saw at least 5 different batches of deer.

Got to LaGrande. The motel sucked. Tiny, run down, and the worst beds ever.

Linda wanted to go to church in Baker City, so we drove on down. This time we booked a room at the Geisler Grande. A little more fancy than we usually try, but I'm trying to loosen up about these things and I could tell Linda really wanted to do it.

So, we can't check in until 3:00, so I'm writing this at a roadside stop while Linda is at church, and then it's on to Joseph, probably. So we'll end up driving as much as if we went to Boise, afterall.

Tomorrow (Monday) we'll visit as many bookstores as we can find, and check out the Baker City and LaGrande downtowns. Maybe, if the Grande is super cool, we'll stay another night. Or head back and take it easy on Tuesday.

Promised Linda I would't run down the battery on her laptop, so that's it for now.

Checking the days.

I work four days a week. The extra day is pure luxury. But because I have employees coming in the second half of the day, I've also been prone to head home early lately, 4:00 or so.

After taking off for a full week earlier in July (my first full week ever), I decided that I needed to stay at the store all day for a couple of weeks. Partly to find out if I'm missing anything --anything I'm not seeing as to why people aren't buying....

Business picked up. Couldn't see much that either my employees or myself were doing that would affect sales all that much. What the employees miss in ability to make deals or in knowledge, they seem to make up for in enthusiasm and friendliness.

So that aint it.

I did finally find out why Magic sales were down. A customer who's been making noises about opening a game store, bought a quantity online to sell to his friends. Yep. Just like where sports cards went. Sadly, I'd be willing to sell these guys the same boxes for only 15.00 more, if they just committed, but I know that once this sort of thing starts happening it keep happening.

Meanwhile, business really picked up the last two weeks of the month, and even more so in the last 5 days. Those affluent, curious tourists that I've been looking for finally started to appear.

But there was an entire month, from mid-June to mid-July that was 30% slower than it should have been.

Imagine your paycheck randomly and unexpectedly shorted by 30%. Imagine that can happen at any time without explanation. Or it might go up by 30% randomly and without warning.

What ends up happening is that you plan for the 30% drop, in case it happens. You don't plan for the 30% increase -- because if that happens it's a simple matter of increasing orders -- or biting the bullet and setting aside the extra for the next 30% drop. (Easy to say, but you usually are trying to replace inventory and or build on what seems to be working.)

In theory, there is unlimited upside to income in owning your own business. That is the risk of having 30% drops is compensated by the possibility that you could earn way more than your average wage earner. The wage earner gets a steady paycheck, and that's it. In theory.

I'd love to see that theory proved out for once...

Sure, my income has increased over the years -- but then, in theory, a steady paycheck probably would've increased over the years, too.

The real difference is that I'm in charge.

Again, in theory. At the mercy of the wholesalers and the customers and the Downtowners and the government and the...did I say customers? ....and the employees and the manufacturers and the landlords and the publishers and the customers.

Other than that, I'm in charge.

Comic reviews.

It used to take me two days to do my monthly comic orders. Nowadays, I can do it in one day. It's an activity that seems to suck brain cells directly out my ears, though. So I usually sleep on my orders, and try to give them a fresh look the next day.

So I got done yesterday in time to do some comic reading.

IZombie #1-3: I've always like Mike Allred's art, but haven't much cared for his writing. This title is written by Chris Roberson and is a fun read. Kind of a goth, zombie combo.

Terminator #1: Well done. Reminds me of the movies, which is why you'd read it in the first place, right?

Joe the Barbarian #1 - 6: This is one of Jasper's favorite comics and he's been hounding me to read it. It's great! What comics should be. It's told from the perspective of a kid who's going into diabetic shock and starts to imagine that he has opened a window to another world, populated by his action figures and toys (interesting crowd scenes, with all kinds of DC characters since this is a Vertigo title) and most especially by his pet rat, Jack, who is a giant warrior rodent named Chakk.

To me, Grant Morrison is especially effective in writing these little, contained stories, like WE3. He manages to create real emotion.

Captain Swing #1: Set in 1830, it's a steam punk story starring Captain Swing (or Spring-heeled Jack or....Jack the Ripper.) It's a time travel story -- I think, and I can't tell if Jack is a good guy (rebel) or a bad guy.

DV8 #3 & 4: Way better than it should be, because the superhero team is pretty lame, but Brian Wood manages to make them seem interesting by setting them on a world where their superpowers make them gods.

Sweet Tooth : One of my favorite reads. The "Big Guy" is coming around, I can tell. He'll save the little kid in the end, I just know it.

Electric Ant #3 & 4: A very effective adaptation of a Philip K. Dick story, with all the paranoia and questioning of reality intact.

Garrison #3: A mysterious agent, who is still a little too mysterious 3 issues in, for my taste. Still, I'll keep reading.

Batman: Odyssey #1: A strange title. They gave the 70's - 80's Batman artist, Neal Adams, freedom to write what he wants. The results are -- dated. It seems really old-fashioned, and 'off' somehow. But an interesting curiosity. Not sure if I'll read further.

Turf #2: The turf war between gangsters, aliens and vampires continues in 1930's New York. Written heavily but effectively by English talk show guy, Jonathan Ross. The plot's a little thick, and the exposition is a bit much, but the dialogue and scenes setting are well done.

Scarlett #1: The third ICON (creator owned, and a reward for Marvel's biggest producers) title, after Kick-Ass and Nemesis. This one's by Brian Bendis, and Alex Maleev, and it's another very intriguing story that's over the top (like Kick-Ass,) with first class production. I think these ICON titles are the best these guys can do...

Tom Strong and the Robots of Doom #1: It isn't Alan Moore, and it shows.

Comic Book Guy, The Comic Book #1: Do I have to explain? Not as funny as it should be, but moderately entertaining. And we comic book guys really do fit a stereotype, don't we?

Sparta #4 & 5: Imagine Red Dawn, only the rebellion starts in a "Village" that is a lot like an idealized 1950's America. I like it, even if I'm not completely sure what's going on.

Wet Noodles.

A couple of quick notes about the local economy.

I think the deferred building fees is a wet noodle. No real demand.

I suspect the small business loan program that is being hatched in Congress is the same thing.

In both cases, I'm not sure it's even the proper response. Borrowing more money for already struggling business's? Trying to encourage more houses when we already have a huge oversupply?

Both seem sort of short sighted.

I know that in my store, I'm not going to be borrowing money to expand until I see demand increase. For instance, I talked lately about installing a couple of more shelves of paperback books, but my estimate was at least 1,000.00 to put it in, which I would have to either pull out of savings of use the credit cards.

With the slowdown in sales I saw this month, I'm going to delay that. Or install it over a three or four month period within my cash flow.

In other words, borrowing money in the face of falling demand seems kind of like borrowing from the future.

Blog dump.

The first half of July was a real challenge to my urge to be candid about my business. Sales were way, way down. Inexplicably. We'd had 7 months of beating the same month sales from the previous years, followed by small drops in May and June. And then -- bang -- a huge drop in the first half of July.

I was writing about this as it was happening -- but only hinting at it with the posts I actually put up.

For one thing, as I always say about Christmas -- they've never canceled it yet. They've never canceled July and August either. These are the big three months, the months where I can almost always count on a profit.

But by mid-month, sales were not even matching my February sales, traditionally my slowest month.

WTF?

As it has happened, the second half of the month has been matching last year every step of the way. Roughly speaking, we were down 30% in the first half, but have matched last year in the second half, which means we'll be down by 15%. Still a significant number, but not a complete disaster. In fact, we may end up only about 12% below last year, if the sales over the last five days continue...

As I'll mention in the following posts, we were turning a profit even during the big downturn, but that was because I'd positioned to store for major profits, and instead we were staying in the black.

As one last slam about "Our Wonderful Downtown Promotions" I can document that each and every 'event' day was down an average of 400.00 per day. One event day we did 78.00 worth of business, which wreaks havoc with any kind of average.

To me, it's no accident that our sales jumped 30% as soon as the "Special Events" were out of the way.

Just saying.

Finally, I have to say a word about the purpose of this blog. I've always intended to be honest about the store, but frankly, I haven't been challenged. Pegasus Books has been doing well -- and we've had three of our most profitable years during the Great Recession. I saw the downturn coming and positioned my store correctly, and we've been pretty much sailing through the downturn. Knock Wood. (Not that I wouldn't have preferred the sales levels of 2004-2007; that would've been bankable profits.)

So this was the first real blip on the screen. (We had comparable drops in sales during the beginning of the Great Recession, but it was expected. As I'll continually repeat, it's the profits that matter, not the sales.) Even with the drop in the first half of the month, as I will tell you again and again in the following posts, we were in the black. It's just that it was a bit dispiriting not to be making those profits I was so looking forward to.

So I'm going to post three of the posts that I was writing while the sales decline was happening, with a note at the beginning for context.

I've always said, if I was doing really poorly, I wouldn't say a word. And you guys wouldn't notice. People don't notice what you aren't saying, you know. It's the guys who are doing either really poorly that won't talk about their business, or guys who are doing really well and don't want anyone to know.

No. Scotch that. Most business owners don't want to talk about their business at all, and I can't really blame them.

As far as I'm concerned, there is a double dip recession already happening. Whatever the economists tell you. And I'm planning accordingly.



Anyway for anyone with the gumption or the interest, the following three posts were written in the course of the month.

7/8/10.

SOMETHING NO MERCHANT TALKS ABOUT...

Here's something that no one talks about: falling sales.

Just try to get a merchant to talk about THAT, except in the most vague of terms and cloaked with a "misery loves company" patina. That is, if everyone is going through the same thing, it's O.K. to admit it -- sort of.

So I'm going submit that I'm willing to talk about it because I'm feeling pretty secure in the overall strength of my business. It's the guys who don't want to talk about it who you need to worry about.

I'm going to reassure you all that we're doing fine, thank you very much. Which is true. I'm disappointed that I'm not going to make the nice hefty profits I was planning for, and instead will make a smaller profit. And I'm also thanking my lucky stars that the same decisions that make money also save money.

O.K. We got that out of the way?

Nevertheless, we've had three months of falling sales -- Year to Year -- after 7 months of increasing sales, after -- well, the Great Recession over the preceding two years.

Still, it's something I have to be aware of, and I have to examine the causes.

Is it me or the economy?

Is it just my store, or is it everyone?

Is it just my type of store, and are other stores of my type experiencing the same?

Is it the type of product I sell, or something else?

Unfortunately, other than vague and contradictory information for the mass media, which is usually dated months in the past -- or vague and contradictory comments in business bulletin boards -- there is not real way of knowing how everyone else is doing.

Remember, too, there are always exceptions both in the positive and the negative, who don't represent the average but who are often the most vocal and visible.

So it can feel very lonely. I have a saying though, that has been true almost every time. 'If I'm feeling it, others are feeling it even worse.' Because -- well, I'm quick to react and to do something about it. I don't think denial is a very useful activity.

The temptation on my part, almost always, is to immediately assume that it's something I did. That it's my fault, and I need to fix it. More often than not, though, I find after enough time has passed, the growth or diminution of sales was due mostly to outside factors, instead.

Contrary to popular opinion, I don't tend to believe we store owners are as responsible for the level of sales as much as responsible for maintaining the level of sales, of riding the waves of demand up and down. We lay out the menu, we don't make people hungry. If the food we provide is tasty enough, they'll come back. If it isn't, they won't. But that urge to eat -- that comes natural.

Comics are the best example of that. I don't tend to think I create comic readers. Mostly they come in, already primed. The more inventory I have that fits their needs, the more I sell.

Baseball cards were the first example of being unable to reverse a larger trend. I couldn't stop the decline of cards no matter what I did. In fact, I would've been better off letting it happen -- and once I finally figured that out, my store got immediately healthier. It's why I'm still here and still selling the occasional cards. Because I moved on.

This is not to say, I shouldn't do my job. I've been able to attribute falling sales over the years to things like; too little or the wrong inventory, my attitude or the attitude of my employees; over-expansion and resulting quality control failures, and so so on. But these usually either just added to an existing problem; and even if I had done everything right, I probably couldn't have reversed the natural cycle of demand.

O.K. So what can I do?

First of all, I can crunch the numbers and try to identify where the sales drop is occurring. Is it a natural statistical anomaly? (Which are pretty common.)

Secondly, I can ask myself if I'm doing something different that might be causing that drop?

Third, I can ask myself if there is something different I could do to reverse that drop?

Fourth, I can try to make my best guess with limited and dated information whether or not others in my business are having similar results?

Based on those answers, I can decide to:

1.) Take my lumps and wait for it to turn around.
2.) Throw more money at the problem (or less.)
3.) Look for alternative products to sell.
4.) Look at my pricing strategy.

You don't want to over-react. I think lots of business throw the baby out with the bathwater, once the product quits performing at the higher levels. Alternatively, lots of business stick to a failing product or approach and keep throwing good money after bad.

The answer is usually somewhere in between. Which is why I've tried to diversify my store. I can, for instance, crunch the numbers and decide to continue to carry Magic, but to order smaller quantities and price at closer to retail and see what happens. I can curtail my sports card box sales to the occasional brand. I can increase my boardgame and new book buys. I can moderate my graphic novel orders. And so on.

The only thing I'm really doing different right now, is that I have more employees. I just took an entire week off. So what if it's because I'm not there?

Sorry, the answer isn't for me to be there more. I'll accept smaller profits, if it means I can take time off. So I'm hoping that isn't it. I'll explore that possibility around the edges, question what they're doing and what they're seeing. But really, other than hovering over them, there isn't much more I can do. I'm more in danger of burnout than I am of less sales. I'm fresher and more active when I do work when I have weekends off.

Crunching the numbers, the sales are down in three categories -- and I think it's just the way it is. Certainly, they haven't shown enough strength for me to want to reinforce them.

On the other hand, comics and graphic novels are fine -- which is my main source. So I want to fully support them. Books and games are doing very well, and it may be time to support them even more.

So...the answer, at least for right now, is to let those falling categories find some sort of bottom and divert my funds into the parts of the store that are working....



Had enough? No? Here's another one.

7/14/10.

I'M ALL RIGHT, JACK.

NOTE: The following three posts were written over the last three weeks, as I realized that the sales drop was for real. I didn't want to post them, at first, because they might make us seem weak. And yet, I realized, we're actually doing pretty well, profit wise, and this is the reality of business and everyone ought to know it.

These posts are similar, and represent my acknowledgment of what was happening and how to respond. The usefulness of this blog is dependent on me being as candid as possible.

In a way, I'm saying, I can post these because we are solid. I'm trusting that by continuing to be candid, you guys can get a true sense of our relative strength and weaknesses. (I've mentioned before, if we ever got into any real trouble, you probably wouldn't hear a peep out of me -- I ain't totally crazy. heh.) Forthwith:

Here's a weird thing. This month's drop in sales for me may be the largest percentage drop in sales since the Great Recession started. And yet. And yet.

I'm still going to turn a profit.

Starting on July 16th, I had paid the last of the big bills for this month, just scraping the bottom of my cashflow reserve. After that, I have three smaller bills left for the entire month.

How can this be?

I positioned the store to make some big profits this summer. Instead, I'm going to make some small profits.

This has happened again and again in the course of my business. Apparently, the same impulse that tells me to start garnering profits, is the same impulse that should tell me that some sort of cycle is reaching it's end.

Thank goodness for the impulse. It's disappointing in the same way that you're disappointed that someone shot an arrow at you, but it just grazed your forehead.

It's clearer this time than ever before. In the past, I might have at least entertained the suspicion that sales dropped because I cut back on spending. Not this time. The store is fully stocked in every category. It's possible that if I had spent two or three thousand more on product I might have had two or three thousand more in sales -- but it doesn't seem likely. And even then, it would've been a gamble only to break even, and what's the point of that?

NOTE: (Since I wrote this, I did decide to up my budget on product....)

Besides, starting next week, I have a fresh new budget for August to spend, that is going to more than fill up all the categories yet again.

Here's a bit of anecdotal observation, and I can't vouch for it except as a feeling.

Who are my summer customers?

If I had to describe them, it would be like this: They are usually relatively well off and willing to spend money on vacation. They are intellectually curious. And they have a taste for the offbeat.

My store is like catnip to them. They compliment me lavishly, tell me that 'wish' they had a store like mine near them. They buy stuff old and new, fresh or stale, and they buy in larger quantities.

I just don't think I've seen many of this type of customer so far this summer. I've seen lots of 'local' tourists, that is locals for whom a trip downtown is a bit of a visit. I see locals. I see older tourists who are buying up my 1.00 books and nothing else.

I don't know. I can't quantify it.

All I know, is it is time to react.



Yes, there's more.

7/19/10.

INTUITIVE BUSINESS CYCLES:

People who read this blog probably think I'm a pessimist, and negative person about business.

Actually, the opposite is true.

I always think I'm going to do better than I actually do.

I always think I'm going to turn a profit.

I mentioned before that I thought we were nearing a nexus point, because it was my intent to try to earn a profit this summer, starting in July, and all through the fall, and into Christmas.

Thing is, every time I've ever tried to do this, I've experienced an abrupt falloff on the very same month.

Well, it's happened again.

I have a kind of vague suspicion as to why this occurs. In my 30 year store history, I've probably had 10 or 12 occasions where I experience a period of steady growth and/or stability.

The first 3 or 4 times this happened, my inclination was to take this success and expand.

The second 3 or 4 times this happened, my inclination was to consolidate and diversify.

The last 3 or 4 times this happened, my inclination to diversify and/or turn a profit.

I'm not talking about a daily profit that pays my wages -- Pegasus Books has almost always paid me a minimum wage, at least. I'm talking about the kind of profit that pays for extras, or even more importantly, pays for some sort of post-store-owning life.

Anyway, consciously or unconsciously, I seem to have tapped into some sort of cycle, some sort of rhythm to business -- where I'm inclined try to capitalize on success, at the very same moment that success becomes problematic.

A.) As you can imagine, expanding based on success, only to see a falloff, really hurts.

B.) Consolidating based on success, by which I mean paying down on debt, and trying to diversify the product line within cash flow, while not very satisfying, at least keeps the store alive.

C.) Trying to 'profit' from success, and breaking even, is even less satisfying, except in the most "I dodged a bullet" way.

See, the same steps I take to "make a profit" are the same steps I should take in the face of a downturn.

Ironically, by taking those steps, I've probably saved myself from disaster, and survived all these years. If I was simply responding to a downturn, it would probably take me at least three months, and probably more like six months, to adapt to the new circumstances. Instead, I seem to match the downturn, step by step.

It's apparently an intuitive process. It took me a long time to realize what was happening.